<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Show 37 &#8211; Mic shootout from $120-$1900; transfer recordings between different formats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/</link>
	<description>Tips and tricks in home recording, microphones, monitors, mixer, Pro Tools, preamp, headphones, studio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zashkaser</title>
		<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Zashkaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homerecordingshow.com/?p=290#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Hey, if I were currently immersed in writing a book explaining set theory, it would have sounded like that to me too, I’m sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, if I were currently immersed in writing a book explaining set theory, it would have sounded like that to me too, I’m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Hildreth</title>
		<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Hildreth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homerecordingshow.com/?p=290#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Well I lost my original notes so I had to listen over again.  Here&#039;s my guess;

-The Most Expensive was Mic A
-The Least Expensive was Mic D
-The best sounding for her voice was Mic A

I also liked Mic B for her voice and I also thought Mic F to be on the lower budget end.

Great Podcast Guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I lost my original notes so I had to listen over again.  Here&#8217;s my guess;</p>
<p>-The Most Expensive was Mic A<br />
-The Least Expensive was Mic D<br />
-The best sounding for her voice was Mic A</p>
<p>I also liked Mic B for her voice and I also thought Mic F to be on the lower budget end.</p>
<p>Great Podcast Guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francesco Canonica</title>
		<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>francesco Canonica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homerecordingshow.com/?p=290#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I have one of these mics so I can&#039;t wait to find out which was used on which recording. My opinions:
A. Very nice, perhaps my favorite. Very clean,transparent throughout the freq spectrum.
B. quite different from mic A, I had a hard time listening past the rumble.Not terribly impressed with this one.
C. Also very nice. A bit of self noise that I could hear, but being that I don&#039;t know the setup, I&#039;ll give it the benefit of doubt and high marks.Once past the noise it was very pleasing,warm, clear mids as well as highs.
D. Very unpleasing to my ears. Like an earlier post, the upper mids are accentuated and muddy.
E. As well this one didn&#039;t muster my praise. Upper mids again accentuated and lacking above that.
F. Nice, quite nice. different from the rest.Whether that&#039;s good or bad I don&#039;t know, but to my ears I liked it. It colored the recording in a pleasant way.
For me, A and F were my favorites followed by C. I tend to prefer good response in the upper frequencies and don&#039;t mind a bit of color to the sound of the mic.I don&#039;t like a mic that feels gauzy and D as well as E both were deep in gauze!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of these mics so I can&#8217;t wait to find out which was used on which recording. My opinions:<br />
A. Very nice, perhaps my favorite. Very clean,transparent throughout the freq spectrum.<br />
B. quite different from mic A, I had a hard time listening past the rumble.Not terribly impressed with this one.<br />
C. Also very nice. A bit of self noise that I could hear, but being that I don&#8217;t know the setup, I&#8217;ll give it the benefit of doubt and high marks.Once past the noise it was very pleasing,warm, clear mids as well as highs.<br />
D. Very unpleasing to my ears. Like an earlier post, the upper mids are accentuated and muddy.<br />
E. As well this one didn&#8217;t muster my praise. Upper mids again accentuated and lacking above that.<br />
F. Nice, quite nice. different from the rest.Whether that&#8217;s good or bad I don&#8217;t know, but to my ears I liked it. It colored the recording in a pleasant way.<br />
For me, A and F were my favorites followed by C. I tend to prefer good response in the upper frequencies and don&#8217;t mind a bit of color to the sound of the mic.I don&#8217;t like a mic that feels gauzy and D as well as E both were deep in gauze!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrei Lopukhin</title>
		<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrei Lopukhin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homerecordingshow.com/?p=290#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Hey guys, good show.  I wanted to add one thing to the segment about transferring files between DAWs: the &quot;Broadcast Wave&quot; format includes timecode information, so using it for the exported tracks saves the extra steps of having to add silence.

Andrei</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, good show.  I wanted to add one thing to the segment about transferring files between DAWs: the &#8220;Broadcast Wave&#8221; format includes timecode information, so using it for the exported tracks saves the extra steps of having to add silence.</p>
<p>Andrei</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZoomForum.us</title>
		<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>ZoomForum.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homerecordingshow.com/?p=290#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Dave, post on the forum and I promise I&#039;ll find someone to talk with you. http://zoomforum.us/viewtopic.php?f=32&amp;t=13072</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, post on the forum and I promise I&#8217;ll find someone to talk with you. <a href="http://zoomforum.us/viewtopic.php?f=32&#038;t=13072" rel="nofollow">http://zoomforum.us/viewtopic.php?f=32&#038;t=13072</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Croft</title>
		<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Croft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homerecordingshow.com/?p=290#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Would love to get some thoughts from you guys on some tube condensers in the 300 to 1500 range. I&#039;ve put a hefty down payment on a Mojave MA-200 and would love to hear your guys take on this mic compared to others in its range (Nuemann TLM 103, AT 4060, etc). Also, when using this new mic for electric guitar, should I use it as a room mic, since I use a Cascade Fathead for my primary go-to guitar mic? Just wanted to get your thoughts. Love the show!!!! Keep on rockin&#039;. 

Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would love to get some thoughts from you guys on some tube condensers in the 300 to 1500 range. I&#8217;ve put a hefty down payment on a Mojave MA-200 and would love to hear your guys take on this mic compared to others in its range (Nuemann TLM 103, AT 4060, etc). Also, when using this new mic for electric guitar, should I use it as a room mic, since I use a Cascade Fathead for my primary go-to guitar mic? Just wanted to get your thoughts. Love the show!!!! Keep on rockin&#8217;. </p>
<p>Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave King</title>
		<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homerecordingshow.com/?p=290#comment-122</guid>
		<description>I love talking to myself!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love talking to myself!  <img src='http://www.homerecordingshow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave King</title>
		<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homerecordingshow.com/?p=290#comment-121</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious to know which one is the Sputnik because I was considering buying one at one time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious to know which one is the Sputnik because I was considering buying one at one time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave King</title>
		<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homerecordingshow.com/?p=290#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Okay.  Here are my thoughts...

A - A favorite

B - Warm.  Maybe one of the tube mics

C - This was my top favorite.  Most neutral sounding.

D - Probably the cheapest one of the bunch. Too much in the upper mid frequencies

E - Warm.  The other tube mic?

F - Good sounding mic, but not my favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay.  Here are my thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>A &#8211; A favorite</p>
<p>B &#8211; Warm.  Maybe one of the tube mics</p>
<p>C &#8211; This was my top favorite.  Most neutral sounding.</p>
<p>D &#8211; Probably the cheapest one of the bunch. Too much in the upper mid frequencies</p>
<p>E &#8211; Warm.  The other tube mic?</p>
<p>F &#8211; Good sounding mic, but not my favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.homerecordingshow.com/2009/06/show-37-mic-shootout-from-120-1900-transfer-recordings-between-different-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.homerecordingshow.com/?p=290#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Good call Dave. The post has been updated. There&#039;s more information (basically everything I said in the show) over on my site http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1090</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call Dave. The post has been updated. There&#8217;s more information (basically everything I said in the show) over on my site <a href="http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1090" rel="nofollow">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=1090</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

